• TXL
    link
    fedilink
    1507 days ago

    Brave is a series scam company.

    • ze stig
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 hours ago

      Ive used Brave for about 2 years. Its great. I have everything turned off, and all shields up, plus deactivated ‘Leo’ AI. Whats not to like?

    • Epzillon
      link
      fedilink
      137 days ago

      Would you mind giving some context? Ive never used Brave, but my dad does. In which sense is it a “scam”? Would want him to switch if its terrible

      • Sonalder
        link
        fedilink
        157 days ago

        People care more about CEO’s opinion on politics and hate Web3 crypto more than they understand technical browser stuff.

        Brave is far from perfect and the company had their contreveries but honestly if you disable all the cryptocrap and tweak it a tiny bit so it does not show you ads and feature you don’t use it is the best chromium browser in regards to security and privacy.

        Ungoogled chromium by default can’t even compare, it’s not crap but brave does so much more than it’s better for the vast majority of users.

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      36 days ago

      And yet it uses less RAM in Android phones compared to my goat, Firefox… Man FF needs a lot of improvements, all my complaints come from Android, the browser is perfect even on macOS!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 days ago

        Firefox still doesn’t support tab groups on mobile. That’s a non-starter for me. Hopfully Ladybird has their shit better put together than mozilla when they finally release their browser

        • kratoz29
          link
          fedilink
          26 days ago

          I haven’t heard about that browser, it seems that it does its own thing, IDK man, if FF that has years in the market and still hasn’t caught up, I have no big hopes for “new” projects.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1307 days ago

    Just because PewDiePie switched to Linux doesn’t mean we should listen to his browser recommendations

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      406 days ago

      True but he’s sparking more interest in FOSS so that’s still a good thing. I doubt his advice is perfect but if it gets more people started onto their own journey it’s a win.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        136 days ago

        You’re right about that, I was moreso saying that his crappy browser tier list isn’t worth sharing

    • Dew
      link
      fedilink
      187 days ago

      Very true, I feel like people miss the point of his own experience and/or opinion

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -6
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      People on Lemmy seem to be Pewdiepie bootlickers. Idk why but it’s really weird. Apparently you can do whatever but as long as you promote Linux, Lemmy will love you. Ridiculous.

  • Sips'
    link
    fedilink
    406 days ago

    This is a random screenshot he used in hos video for roughly 2 seconds. This is not his tierlist.

  • 6R1M R34P3R
    link
    fedilink
    English
    286 days ago

    Not of his. This is a known widespread tierlist made by other person (I do not remember if this came from Reddit, a YT video or what, but it is well known)

  • comfy
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I know it’s been said, but Brave is a hard no. Replace it with Ungoogled Chromium. I haven’t seen the video so I don’t understand why it’s in the “not ideal for a normal human” list, and I am biased since I use plenty of “not for normal” tools.

  • Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    406 days ago

    What exactly has he done to warrant considering this? He’s a yt star, not a privacy expert.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Somehow even less useful, since the source can’t even be verified.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 days ago

        So explicitly not an expert.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 days ago

          Yeah but he was never claiming to be. I don’t think he made any direct recommendations in the video.

          Just him documenting his own journey de-googling.

          • Ech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25 days ago

            My point is it serves no purpose here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    307 days ago

    … I don’t think listening to random big influencers is a good way forward (in anything).

    (As to the list - others already pointed out everything, y’all nerds know shit! <3)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    287 days ago

    Brave? Hard no. Vivaldi? Also no.

    Also, where are qutebrowser and Zen?

    qutebrowser and IceCat are real top of the game when it comes to privacy. But then, they break some of the sites functionality, especially IceCat who seems to be going under the “if your site doesn’t work, it’s your site’s problem” motto.

    • Epzillon
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Which is honestly fair? Like, i would enjoy a “unsafe site, access anyways?” button, but if privacy settings break a page that literally is the pages fault for not respecting privacy.

      Edit: typo

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Kinda, but I would like to tailor my experience a bit more than “all or nothing”.

        IceCat is directly a GNU project, so it’s highly ideological - which is important and respectable in a way, but then it gets adoption to near-zero because most sites just don’t work out of the box, and to make it work properly means completely removing all safeguards that make IceCat make sense. There’s little in between.

        I’d rather have something like LibreWolf, but without phone-home functionality, or at least a switch to turn it off. Out of all Firefox forks I know, only IceCat respects user privacy in this way - 0 connections on startup, and then only connection to actual site and whatever it requires.

        Opt-in telemetry (ideally - leveled) and manual bug information sending are totally fine, though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            67 days ago

            Nothing in the browser should be proprietary. Any proprietary part is a possibility of malice, and browsers are mission critical.

            • LeTak
              link
              fedilink
              27 days ago

              I don’t disagree with that. It’s just that most browsers are built that way, unfortunately. Nothing is free, not even Firefox. If you want to sell it, it’s hard to maintain reasonable expectations that people won’t just build it from source instead of buying it. Something 100% free can’t maintain itself over long time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Firefox is open source, and while it takes some shady practices to fund it (it sure isn’t cheap to run your own damn engine alongside everything on top), I take it as a more tenable compromise. It’s not about free as in beer freedom, it’s about basic security.

                You can also have degoogled Chromium which is open-source if you’re into it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 days ago

                  Even EDGE is a ungoogled Chromium (but containing M$ tracking APIs instead). Vivaldi IS a degoogled Chromium, a small part of the UI (by far the most advanced one of any other browser) is proprietary, but not really obfuscated, they show even in the support forum how the user can modding it, if for him isn’t enough what he can do in the most complete setting page ever, the only thing is, you can’t use it for other browser projects. It’s certainly not a privacy or security issue.

                  Chromium as is, is 100% FLOSS but because of this isn’t more private or secure as a proprietary soft, FLOSS isn’t automaticly synonym of privacy and security, a lot of people confuse it, it’s not the propósit of OpenSource, privacy and security of an soft depends only of the intentions of the developer or company, not if their soft is OSS or not. The user can audit the soft, which in any case is needed if he don’t want or be able to check millons of lines in the code which a complex soft like a browser engine has.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    176 days ago

    Ppl focusing on the negative. It’s just his subjective list. He doesn’t claim to be an expert. Lemmy autism peaking here. More exposure to foss is good guys

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14 days ago

    Why is this guy popping up so much lately on Lemmy? I remember thinking this guy was a piece of shit about a decade ago…

    I haven’t kept up with the times. Was I right? Or did I become an angry old man 20 years to early?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          03 days ago

          It is quite the opposite. It will answer your question in it’s first 30secs. Even reading the other comments here will. Lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            02 days ago

            Quite literally the opposite. The first minute does not answer my question about why he has been appearing all over lemmy. Neither do the comments here.

            Sure he’s trying to degoogle. Hence this post, but that is not what I asked.

            Unclear if you’re a troll or just choosing to be dense…